http://fulviogrimaldi.blogspot.it/2015/05/da-gladio-black-bloc-andiamo-la_5.html#more

MARTEDÌ 5 MAGGIO 2015



http://fulviogrimaldi.blogspot.it/2015/05/da-gladio-black-bloc-andiamo-la_5.html#more
Trentamila persone per una manifestazione addirittura internazionale, lanciata da mesi e contro la *grande opera* per eccellenza, segnano la cornice entro cui ogni ragionamento andrebbe riportato: oggi, se non in rare occasioni, non abbiamo la forza di costruire consenso, veicolare processi di opposizione reale, sedimentare forme di resistenza. Oggi a muoversi sono sempre e solo militanti politici, numericamente sempre meno e sempre più isolati dal corpo sociale che in qualche modo si vuole rappresentare (quello del lavoro: salariato, disoccupato, precario, non pagato, eccetera). I motivi di questo progressivo scollamento sono da ricercarsi dentro di noi, non all’esterno. Non c’è un complotto contro processi di partecipazione, se non la tipica dinamica volta a disincentivarli sempre però presente, in ogni fase della storia, quando questi assumono forma antagonistica. Questo il primo dato da cui partire, che però spiega i motivi per cui, a seconda del contesto, si dovrebbe avere l’intelligenza e la capacità di scegliere lo strumento più adatto per esprimere un messaggio politico.
Per quanto ci riguarda, siamo saliti a Milano con la consapevolezza di partecipare in forma minore, senza velleità protagonistiche, consapevoli che da tempo la città stava investendo tutta l’energia politica di cui è attualmente capace per l’occasione, fidandoci dunque dei compagni che in qualche modo ci si stavano sbattendo. Abbiamo partecipato nello spezzone che consideravamo centrale nel discorso “no-Expo”, quello del lavoro. E’ la questione lavorativa il cuore del significato dell’Expo; sono le forme che il lavoro assume nei progetti pilota quali Expo che minano alla radice le nostre condizioni di vita; sono tali sperimentazioni sociali che poi il capitale generalizza trovando sbocco alla sua necessità di profitto. E’ dunque nella questione lavorativa che si trovano le ragioni della nostra opposizione alla grande opera Expo. Tutelando noi e la metà del corteo dietro agli scontri, abbiamo – insieme agli altri compagni presenti: dai sindacati conflittuali ai collettivi che fondano il proprio agire nella contraddizione capitale-lavoro – garantito che metà corteo giungesse infine alla sua naturale conclusione, evitando la dispersione del corteo stesso.
Non eravamo materialmente presenti nel fuoco degli scontri, evitiamo dunque di parlare di dinamiche che ci vengono raccontate ma che sono frutto di legittime decisioni altrui. Soprattutto, non ci accodiamo al pensiero mainstream che da subito ha iniziato la consueta opera denigratoria. Non c’è un corteo buono e uno cattivo; non ci sono infiltrati; non c’è una parte sana e una malata. Questa cosa va detta con fermezza, in ogni dove. C’è solo tanta rabbia, che va articolata ed espressa nel migliore dei modi (e dubitiamo che questo “migliore dei modi” sia quello visto ieri), ma che in ogni caso non condanniamo perché non è certo il comportamento dei subalterni che oggi può essere messo sul banco degli imputati. Ci sono delle scelte politiche precise e una “narrazione conflittuale” che da tempo ha preso il sopravvento sulla strategia politica. Non è lo scontro e la devastazione il problema oggi. E’ come creare consenso attorno a pratiche conflittuali. E’ questo ciò che manca, ed è da qui che si deve ripartire, e da subito. Non reiterando discorsi e immaginari che vengono poi raccolti da altri, che con più sapienza e coerenza li portano alle estreme conseguenze. E’ tornando a fare politica, cioè costruendo un discorso conflittuale che vada di pari passo al sentire comune della classe. Senza accelerazioni inutili o altrettanto inutili attendismi.
Quelli che oggi inorridiscono e che magari favoleggiano degli anni Settanta dovrebbero tenere in mente che esteticamente non c’è molta differenza tra la Milano di ieri e una qualsiasi manifestazione del ’77: è il contesto che è radicalmente diverso, la cornice politica radicalmente mutata, i numeri, il consenso diffuso, una dialettica politica differente, differenti organizzazioni capace di reggere pratiche di piazza oggi completamente “anarchiche”. Un modello che oggi non può essere riproposto in sedicesimi sperando di azzeccare la combinazione giusta per caso, scontro dopo scontro, quasi che attraverso una sommatoria di pratiche esteticamente simili si possano riattivare magicamente cicli di lotte ormai trapassati. Tra una sfilata pacifica e una Mercedes in fiamme, ci sembra mancare la politica, quella mediazione capace di spostare in avanti il nostro rapporto di forze con i nemici di classe. Che utilizza il conflitto comemezzo e non come fine, trasformandolo in obiettivo politico strategico e sacrificando ad esso ogni discorso di opportunità politica. Ma questo è un discorso che va affrontato tutti insieme. Da oggi va ricostruita un’opposizione all’Expo, vanno continuati i percorsi e vanno liberati i compagni. Soprattutto quelli arrestati ieri negli scontri. E dopo anni di corruzione, scandali, miliardi sottratti alla cittadinanza, nepotismi vari, disastri economici, sociali e culturali, non ci venissero a parlare di danni d’immagine alla città. Non sarà la collera male organizzata dei subalterni a rendere le nostre ragioni meno decisive.
# LUCMICHEL. NET / KH/ En Bref / Avec AFP – PCN-SPO/ 2015 05 05/
https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel
Témoignages. L’ONG israélienne ‘Breaking the silence’ a publié un rapport accablant sur les crimes commis par Tsahal, la mal nommée armée israélienne, dans la bande de Gaza, en rassemblant les témoignages de plusieurs soldats.
Le site de ‘The Intercept’ a rassemblé une sélection de ces confessions.
On y découvre comment l’armée autorise des tirs de barrage au mortier sans avertissement pour «venger ses morts» ou comment certains pilotes de chars avouent avoir rouler sur des maisons «juste pour le fun». La dernière offensive israélienne à Gaza avait fait plus de 2 000 morts entre juillet et août 2014.
* Le Website de ‘Breaking the silence’:
http://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/
* Sur le site de ‘The Intercept’ (en Anglais) :
Samples of Israeli Horrific Brutality and War Criminality in Gaza
KH
_________________________
Twitter https://twitter.com/LucMichelPCN
PAGE OFFICIELLE Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel
Website http://www.lucmichel.net/
Luc MICHEL/ En Bref / Avec AFP – PCN-SPO/ 2015 05 04/
https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel
Le contrat d’une valeur de 6,3 milliards d’euros de vente d’avions de combat Rafale au Qatar a été signé officiellement ce lundi matin à Doha en présence de François Hollande et de l’émir du Qatar, cheikh Tamim ben Hamad Al-Thani. Le président français est attendu ensuite en Arabie Saoudite en invité d’honneur à un sommet extraordinaire du Conseil de Sécurité du Golfe.
Ou quand l’intérêt économique d’une France en crise conduit à une alliance contre nature: la République (dont l’oligarchie politico-financière française usurpe le nom) avec le régime saoudien réactionnaire et féodal. Sans oublier le Qatar, auquel Sarkozy puis Hollande ont livré la France.
Prétendant défendre la paix alors qu’il va essentiellement vendre des armes françaises à des régimes qui agressent en ce moment leur voisin le Yemen, sur base de critères essentiellement ethno-religieux !
La France n’exporte pas seulement des avions de chasse aux pays du Golfe.
Depuis 1962, ils sont un interlocuteur privilégié dans la vente d’armes légères. Fusil mitrailleur, roquettes et munitions en tout genre, la France a exporté pour environ 16 milliards d’euros d’armement.
La moitié de cette somme a été payée par seulement deux pays, l’Arabie Saoudite et les Émirats arabes unis qui ont déboursé chacun plus de quatre milliards d’euros. François Hollande sera d’ailleurs en Arabie Saoudite aujourd’hui.
De quoi donner encore un peu plus de grain à moudre à ceux qui s’inquiètent de voir la France vendre des avions Rafale dans des zones de tension.
Comment encore justifier les grands discours sur la liberté, l’égalité, les droits de la Femme ?
Comment être “Charlie” en s’alliant au régime wahabite dont l’idéologie précisément est à la base de ce djihadisme importé d’Arabie saoudite ?
Pourquoi interdire le voile islamique en France (en allant au-delà de la loi) et aller soutenir des pays où il est obligatoire, où la Femme est un sous-citoyen ?
Quelle “guerre au terrorisme” mener quand on s’allie à ses parrains idéologiques et logistiques ???
Le régime français, celui de Sarkozy et Hollande, qui a trahit la Ve République du général de Gaulle, est une imposture. Hollande vient une fois de plus de le démontrer …
Luc MICHEL
LIRE:
_________________________
Luc MICHEL /
PROFIL Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pcn.luc.michel.2
Twitter https://twitter.com/LucMichelPCN
PAGE OFFICIELLE Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel
Website http://www.lucmichel.net/
Nundkeswarsing BOSSOONDYAL for EODE PRESS OFFICE/
2015 04 19/
Short report on the Sudanese Presidential Election of 13 to 16th april 2015.
By Nundkeswarsing BOSSOONDYAL (*), EODE Representative for the SADC Region and Mauritius, International observer for these elections.
SUDAN ESSENTIAL DATAS
Number: – Population: Estimate 2015 – 40 million (official 39,105,664 Dec 2014)
Sudanese Sates: 18
Registered Voters 13 millions
Registered Women voters are more than men
State geographic constituencies: 468
National geographic constituency: 213
Political Parties: 80
Independents: Large numbers
Voting centers: 7,133
Presidential Candidates: 16
National Elections Candidates: 2,235 for 425 seats
State assembly’s Candidates: 1,072
THE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS OF MONITORING
FOR THESE SUDANESE PRESIDENTIAL AND NATIONAL ELECTIONS
African Union: H.E Chief Olusegum Obasanjo former president of Nigeria lead the African Union Observers mission. Many Other international groups like Arab League, IGAD and civil societies were among the observers.
As General Secretary of the Non-Aligned Students and Youth Organization (NASYO) and EODE Representative for the SADC Region and Mauritius, I was posted at Blue Nile River region which is some 400 kms from Khartoum. I had pursued my works as mostly according per the principles from the manual of monitoring elections of the UN and AU to observe the elections.
I was fully briefed on the full compliance of the Sudanese laws and regulations,
I observed strict impartiality.
See no bribery activities,
Seen no disclosure of any potential conflict of interests,
Seen courteous treatment of election official,
I had carried my clear identification throughout the mission,
Notice non-interference in the electoral process,
I had good collaboration with other International observers.
OBSERVATION OF THE BLUE NILE RIVER REGION
Region that was under my observation: Blue Nile River region. It has 24 seats for the National Assembly. I had one hour’s questions and answers time with the Chairman of the High Election Commissioner of Blue Nile. Blue Nile consists of 145 polling stations. I interact with few candidates from the opposition parties as well as to the ruling party candidates and also with all political parties’ agents outside the polling stations.
I had notice that each voting room had an official with few elections officers and with parties’ agents for the verification of registered voters. I had seen the 7 ballots that each elector has to vote. Had seen the transparent voting boxes properly sealed. I had interacted also with the electors and chief of the villages, tribes and peoples in street about the process of the election to know their feeling and remarks.
However, I notice that among the 16 names of candidates for the Presidential Candidates mostly are not well known. I was further understood that few parties did not participate in the election 2015 as some of them were involved in having subversive approached during previous elections.
OBSERVATION AND CONCLUSION
After seriously looking and analyzing the above facts, I am fully satisfied that the Presidential and National Election of 2015 held in Sudan, according to my opinion and that of my organizations’ network went PEACEFULLY, FREE, FAIR and TRANSPARENT.
Nundkeswarsing BOSSOONDYAL,
(*) General Secretary, Non-Aligned Students and Youth Organization (NASYO) International NGO.
EODE Representative for the SADC Region and Mauritius.
_____________________________
EODE- Eurasian Observatory for Democracy and Elections
# LUCMICHEL. BXL/
Le contrat d’une valeur de 6,3 milliards d’euros de vente d’avions de combat Rafale au Qatar a été signé officiellement ce lundi matin à Doha en présence de François Hollande et de l’émir du Qatar, cheikh Tamim ben Hamad Al-Thani. Le président français est attendu ensuite en Arabie Saoudite en invité d’honneur à un sommet extraordinaire du Conseil de Sécurité du Golfe.
Ou quand l’intérêt économique d’une France en crise conduit à une alliance contre nature: la République (dont l’oligarchie politico-financière française usurpe le nom) avec le régime saoudien réactionnaire et féodal. Sans oublier le Qatar, auquel Sarkozy puis Hollande ont livré la France.
Prétendant défendre la paix alors qu’il va essentiellement vendre des armes françaises à des régimes qui agressent en ce moment leur voisin le Yemen, sur base de critères essentiellement ethno-religieux !
Comment encore justifier les grands discours sur la liberté, l’égalité, les droits de la Femme ?
Comment être “Charlie” en s’alliant au régime wahabite dont l’idéologie précisément est à la base de ce djihadisme importé d’Arabie saoudite ?
Pourquoi interdire le voile islamique en France (en allant au-delà de la loi dans les écoles) et aller soutenir des pays où il est obligatoire, où la Femme est un sous-citoyen ?
Quelle “guerre au terrorisme” mener quand on s’allie à ses parrains idéologiques et logistiques ???
Le régime français, celui de Sarkozy et Hollande, qui a trahit la Ve République du général de Gaulle, est une imposture. Hollande vient une fois de plus de le démontrer …
Luc MICHEL
PCN-TV & RT/ 2015 05 03 / Avec Europäischer Widerstand – lucmichel.net /
Massacre d’Odessa, il y a un an déjà !
A Moscou ce 2 mai 2015, des patriotes russes déposent des fleurs sur un monument en mémoire de la tragédie d’Odessa …
Video sur : https://vimeo.com/126735729
# ALLER PLUS LOIN :
SUR LA VOIX DELA RUSSIE & PCN-TV/ POUR ‘LE 9 MAI’ 2014 LUC MICHEL PARLAIT DU MASSACRE NEONAZI D’ODESSA ET DE LA RESPONSABILITE DE WASHINGTON ET BRUXELLES
L’INTERVIEW CHOC de Luc MICHEL par Igor YAZON
Sur les ondes de la Radio russe pour le ‘Jour de la Victoire’ du 9 mai 2014 :
Le massacre Odessa et au-delà.
Quand l’idéologie occidentale produit la monstruosité criminelle …
en podcast sur https://vimeo.com/94789215
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=750609028317567
PCN-TV / PCN-SPO /
_____________________
PCN-SPO / Focus / 2015 05 01 /
Focus: The fact of the day decrypted by Luc MICHEL
for the NCP-PCN Press Office / PCN-SPO
Read on AFP (Paris) This April 30, 2015:
“Vietnam on Thursday denounced the” barbaric crimes “committed by the United States on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the fall of Saigon, the last episode of a war that claimed millions of lives. “They have committed countless barbaric crimes, have caused immeasurable losses and a lot of pain to the people of our country”, told Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung to the crowd in front of the palace of independence, assaulted 40 years ago by the North Vietnamese tanks. The “ardent patriotism” led to the final victory thanks to the “brilliant and creative direction of the party,” said Mr Dung. In front of him, regiments of soldiers brandishing a forest of flags marked with the hammer and sickle marched, recalling the entry of the tanks of the communist forces in the city. “
The Vietnam war of liberation is a major historical event: the defeat in 1975 of US imperialism. Because Vietnam is the only war that the US has lost since 1945. And this defeat goes beyond the War of liberation and unification of the Vietnamese nation.
What does mean the American defeat in Vietnam?
How will this defeat be placed in the geopolitical perspective of the global anti-imperialist struggle and the European liberation struggle?
# I: THE LIBERATION AND UNIFICATION WAR OF THE VIETNAMESE NATION IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE GLOBAL ANTI-IMPERIALIST STRUGGLE
“When I was young, I dreamed one day to see my country free and unified”
– Vo Nguyen Giap (interview with PBS)
On 30 April 1975, the tanks of the National People’s Army of Vietnam supported by the Vietcong guerillas forces seized the presidential palace in Saigon. The US puppet regime of South Vietnamese Kollabos collapsed, the Yankee ambassador left the city in shame, the Stars and Stripes rolled as a cloth under his arm. The long struggle for national and social liberation of Vietnam, begun at the dawn of the 20’s, was finally over. The alliance of the Communist Party and the Vietnamese nationalist movement had defeated, a small courageous people of peasant soldiers had driven away the first imperialist world power.
The Vietnamese National-Communism gave to the peoples of the world, and especially to the European revolution, a lesson in courage and hope: YES AMERICA CAN BE DEFEATED!
1975: LIBERATION AND UNIFICATION OF THE VIETNAMESE NATION
40 years after the end of the liberation war, the Vietnamese people still suffer from the legacy of countless odious chemical weapons used by the imperialists ready for anything at that time, as today in other parts of the world, to destroy nations who resist their domination. Three million Vietnamese soldiers and civilians were killed during the war, which only had 58,000 dead on the American side, where it was used to make war with the blood of others.
Years of American denial, Western propaganda to rewrite the history of the war by describing the valiant communist fighters of the Indochinese peninsula as monsters, years of demonization, xenophobia in books, films and speeches of imperialists have not removed one of the greatest victories of progressive revolutionaries and did not prevent their historic struggle to become an example for all peoples now facing the terrorist strategies of Washington and its ‘European’ allies of NATO.
The hypocrite shame of the US, its cynical mea culpa about the methods used in Vietnam and, in general, the US support for the reactionary dictatorships in many countries – what the South Vietnamese regime was -, masks further abuses again perpetrated in the name of the free world, of capitalist democracy and imperialist morality.
The national communism victory in Vietnam, closely uniting national and social liberation, is the heritage of all European and international revolutionary militants. This is the legacy of Vietnam …
THE WAR OF LIBERATION OF VIETNAM BEYOND THE YANKEE PROPAGANDA
In the Vietnam War, the collective memory keeps a host of shock images, photos that have the distinction of having been taken by a single camp, the one of South Vietnameses and foreigners. Twenty-five years later only, we discovered the clichés of North Vietnamese photographers, remained virtually unknown outside the Communist press.
An example? The liberation of Saigon …
Distraught Vietnamese climbing the wall of the US Embassy. A US helicopter taking off, while clusters of desperates are still trying to board. These best images of the fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975 reflect only one side of the story. In the opposite camp, a trio of the greatest North Vietnamese war photographers show a completely different picture book. Their photos, taken from albums and dusty files, tell the joy of the liberation of Saigon, now Ho Chi Minh City. Dinh Quang Thanh, who followed a Viet Minh tank to the steps of the presidential palace, seized the Saigon crowds covering with viva and food the Northern soldiers.
“We listened to the South Vietnamese radio, saying that there would be a bloodbath if the Communists took power. We knew it was propaganda, and I wanted to show the truth with my camera”, Thanh, now retired, explained to AFP in 2005,. The truth: four soldiers rushed inside the palace to raise the victorious banner, or southern ministers and soldiers, looking resigned but not frightened.
The North Vietnamese photographers have shared the merciless harshness of the war in the jungle, full-fledged combatants. “I considered myself a soldier, the camera was my weapon,” says Thanh. The Northern newspapers have certainly never published pictures that could undermine the war effort. But these photographers feel their work perfectly aware of the terrible suffering during the war, which caused three million deaths, North and South alike. None of the photographers was expected recognition or fortune of a work almost never shown in the non-Communist world.
But things eventually changed. In 1997, two photographers of the time, the independent Tim Page and Horst Faas, becoming editors at the Associated Press, have published “Requiem”, book-tribute to the photojournalists of the two camps who died in the conflict. For his part, Trong Thanh eventually was successful, in any case in the light of these modest North Vietnamese photographers: he published two books, one in the US, the other in Japan. His favorite photograph was never published during the war: a Northern soldier, kneeling, shares his rations with an injured Southern soldier, in 1971. Exhibited for the first time in 1991 in the United States, it shocked many Americans, who judged it inevitably rigged …
# II: VIETNAM AND ITS GEOPOLITICAL REPERCUSSIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN LIBERATION STRUGGLE
“The great victory of 30 April represents the triumph of the whole nation, of justice on the brutality and of humanity over tyranny”
– Vo Viet Thanh (Mayor of Ho Chi Minh City, for the 25th anniversary of its liberation)
The Vietnam War, through the lessons that all revolutionary militants of the world can still use, did not complete yet in Saigon in 1975, but continues its relentless march to the heart of Europe today. The Vietnam unity, the union of a people divided for too long by Western imperialism, must be an example for Western Europe that the cosmopolitan bourgeois rule seeks to break up and dismantle.
THE HEIRS OF VALMY
The Vietnamese people, with a momentum that symbolizes thousands of Valmy – and will be remembered that Ho Chi Minh and Giap were great admirers of the French Revolution, the one of Robespierre and the Jacobins – by their sacrifices, millions of murdered victims by Yankee soldiers who, despite their technological superiority, have finished broken by peasant soldiers of the Vietnamese national-communist revolution, now shows how to treat the imperialist invader.
And if depleted uranium in Iraq and Yugoslavia has replaced the Vietnam orange gas, the lethal strategy of imperialism is always the same, with one difference. The Vietnam War was lost because the international public at large has turned against US abuses, and since then, Washington has developed a media propaganda machine so powerful that it is able to manipulate entire nations. The Western media, slaves of imperialism and its military arm of NATO, prostitutes of capitalist domination, petty Kollabo hirelings, purposely prevent the European people to open their eyes to the modern colonialism of the United States.
We must never forget that if the war there stopped in 1975, it started on our European soil. Openly when Washington declared war on national-communist Yugoslavia of President Milosevic. Slyly elsewhere, in the Balkans or the Caucasus. Not to mention the Mediterranean, the Middle East and Africa, where Washington and its Zionist ally and accomplice hit European, Arab and African independence.
The tens of thousands of American soldiers and hundreds of thousands of imperialist collaborators of South Vietnam who lost their lives facing the indomitable momentum of national and revolutionary communism should be so many signs of hope for each European progressive militant, in the West as in the East, and Western imperialism, which triumphs now where Nazism had been finally defeated, has too quickly forgotten the warning given by Ho Chi Minh and his freed people to all those who want to reduce the world to slavery.
TO FINALLY END WITH THE YANKEE SUPERPOWER!
Since the end of the Cold War, the United States defines itself as the “supreme superpower.” The US claims to global dominance exhibited since 1943, in particular by James BURNHAM (the ancestor of the neocons) in “The Struggle for the World”, have become a ubiquitous reality.
In March 1992, after the implosion of the USSR and the beginning of the breakup of Yugoslavia, the Pentagon published, in conjunction with the “National Security Council”, the highest court of yankee international politics, a “Wolfowitz Report” (who will be 10 years later one of the ministers of the Bush II regime and a leader of the neocons) explaining how the USA intends to remain the only superpower: “US foreign policy must have the goal of convincing potential competitors that they do not need to play a greater role. Our status as sole superpower needs to be perpetuated by constructive behavior and sufficient military might to deter any nation or group of nations to challenge US supremacy. The United States must consider with interest the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging US leadership or seeking to jeopardize the economic and political order. A dominant military power must be maintained to deter potential rivals even that of aspiring to a larger regional or global role. The international order is ultimately guaranteed by the United States and it must be put in a position to act independently when collective action can not be established. “.
The Report directly aimed Europe, this “group of nations”: “We must act to prevent the emergence of an exclusively European security system that could destabilize NATO.” Japan is also described: “In the Far East, we must remain alert to the risks of destabilization that would come from an increased role for our allies, especially Japan.”
Are allies enemies? Paul-Marie de La Gorce commented the Wolfowitz report in “Le Monde Diplomatique”: “The Wolfowitz report is distinguished by its insistence to favor military power as an essential instrument of international dominance of the United States that is to be preserved. The fundamental concern to preserve the status of sole superpower of the United States is not only for its former adversaries but also for its allies. Very symptomatically, the report qualifies as “less visible” victory, won at the end of the Cold War, “the integration of Germany and Japan in a collective security system led by the United States.” This naturally excludes the accession of both countries to the rank of military nuclear power. “
NATO is not an alliance, it is a harness designed to perpetuate the occupation of Europe. European politicians who submit are traitors, new Kollabos. Against imperialism of the yankee superpower, only one solution: Liberation and unification of the European Nation, from Reykjavik to Vladivostok! 25 years ago Vietnam showed us by example. A billion political Europeans can they least than 25 million Vietnameses?
Luc MICHEL
___________________________
Photos: Cover of NAZIONE EUROPA, Italian weekly of the PCN-NCP in 2000 (it was still then the paper press) for the 25th anniversary of the Liberation of Saigon, “For a European Vietnam”. 15 years after nothing more to say …
Vers 18h30 GMT ou 19h30 (Yaounde) ou 20H30 (Bruxelles/Paris/Berlin)
Le programme complet !!!
Présentée par Bachir Mohamed LADAN
Avec les panelistes, les correspondants internationaux
et Luc MICHEL (en duplex depuis Bruxelles)
En direct sur streaming sur http://www.afriquemedia.tv/le-live
Retrouvez nous sur Facebook …
GROUPE OFFICIEL AFRIQUE MEDIA TV
(administré par Bachir Mohamed Ladan et Luc Michel)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/afrique.media.groupe.officiel/
# LES THEMES DE ‘FACE A L’ACTUALITE’ DU MARDI 5 MAI 2015 :
EDITION SPECIALE “CAMEROUN & ELECTIONS”
Bande-annonce spéciale sur : https://vimeo.com/126751419
I-
ALTERNANCE AU CAMEROUN:
Faut-il redouter l’après BIYA?
II-
ELECTION EN AFRIQUE :
Pour qui roulent les commissions électorales (CENI, CEI, ELECAM…)?
Les experts internationaux de EODE sur les médias …
EODE-TV & AFRIQUE MEDIA TV / Avec EODE Press Office/ 2015 05 01/
Intervention de Luc MICHEL, Administrateur-général d’EODE,
dans l’émission LE MERITE PANAFRICAIN :
Video sur le Website d’EODE-TV
* Luc MICHEL décrypte la crise politique en Côte d’Ivoire. Il analyse la coupure en deux du pays, la situation du FPI et la stratégie des grands acteurs politiques. Il explique comment « la stratégie de Outtara est une impasse politique. Il termine par une analyse prospective, qui a étonné sur le plateau d’Afrique Media, mais qui a été saluée par les téléspectateurs ivoiriens : « la solution à cette crise qui divise profondément le pays n’appartient plus à Outtara, homme du passé et des Occidentaux, mais passe par deux acteurs majeurs : d’une part le couple Gbagbo et d’autre part Guillaume Soro, l’ex premier ministre aujourd’hui à la tête du Parlement ivoirien. En politique, il n’y a pas d’inimitiés éternelles » …
Diffusé en direct sur AFRIQUE MEDIA TV
Le 1er mai 2015 dans l’émission ‘LE MERITE PANAFRICAIN’
présentée par Alain Michel YETNA.
EODE-TV / EODE Press Office /
________________________
EODE-TV sur Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/eodetv
Retrouvez nous sur Facebook
avec le « Groupe officiel AFRIQUE MEDIA TV » : https://www.facebook.com/groups/afrique.media.groupe.officiel/