I valori anti Trump: lo sfruttamento del lavoro

Nike e marchi sfruttamentoOrmai sappiamo che chi detta l’agenda alla cosiddetta società civile disgustata dal popolo (visto chi la comanda non dovrebbe destare alcuna sorpresa) è gente come Soros, un magnate speculatore, ma ora anche i “grandi marchi” o meglio, le corporate come ci insegna Repubblica sono usciti allo scoperto. Si sà, le multinazionali sono tanto tanto solidali e anti razziste, sfruttano chiunque più o meno allo stesso modo e questo è grande indice di progresso a quanto pare per i moralizzatori del mondo. Ora il dumping sociale è trasformato in “inclusione” sociale, in integrazione quindi lo sfruttamento E’ UNA COSA BUONA.

Starbucks aprirà a Milano ed in vista probabilmente dei cambiamenti climatici decide di sostituire le piante autoctone con piante tipiche di climi caldi. Un emblema, così ragiona il capitale. Plasma, modifica a piacimento il creato, inclusi GLI UMANI. Starbucks non condivide la politica migratoria di Trump, fa sapere che assumerà i “rifugiati”. Dove più che in Italia può sfruttare clandestini e manodopera a nero, se non nel regno del CAPORALATO?

Avvisate comunque Starbucks che i richiedenti asilo, in attesa di riconoscimento dello status di rifugiati, NON POSSONO LAVORARE, per legge, almeno per i primi 6 mesi. Ma per quanto importa loro delle leggi ed in Italia non siamo famosi per farle rispettare.

NIKE fa sapere di non condividere le politiche migratorie di Trump, è una questione di morale. E dato che lotta contro le discriminazioni, SFRUTTA tutti i lavoratori in modo eguale.

Immagino che risulti in linea con i loro “valori” così come i valori della cosiddetta società civile, lo sfruttamento di manodopera, inclusa quella minorile. Ne prendiamo atto trattasi di rispetto dei diritti umani da imporre in giro per il mondo onde non essere tacciati di essere retrogradi.

Rimando solo ad un link Multinazionali del dolore. Caso quattro: Nike, articolo del 2013

Riporto l’inizio:

La Nike, multinazionale americana che produce e distribuisce in tutto il mondo scarpe e palloni di calcio, sfrutta la manodopera a basso costo soprattutto nei paesi dell’Asia come la Cina, la Thailandia, l’Indonesia, la Corea del Sud, il Vietnam. Il salario medio giornaliero di un lavoratore è di 50 centesimi per circa 12 ore di lavoro e gli operai, spesso bambini, sono esposti perennemente alle malattie perché lavorano a stretto contatto con i vapori di colle, solventi e vernici.  Le ribellioni e gli scioperi sono oppressi con torture e spesso uccisioni da parte delle polizie locali.

Cara Nike, di cosa hai paura? Di dover produrre le tue scarpe e ammenicoli negli Usa se negli Usa li vuoi vendere? Sei terrorizzata a dover pagare il minimo salariale ai lavoratori americani che certo non è quello che corrispondi ad un minore del Pakistan?

La solita propaganda anti Trump-Obama promosse restrizioni di circolazione dai paesi “terroristi”

visaWaverI disinformatori di regime e servetti vari in  servizio permanente effettivo ACCURATAMENTE ED INTERESSATAMENTE OCCULTANO  IL FATTO CHE il divieto d’ingresso (negli usa) agli islamici di Somalia, Libia, Iran, Iraq, Siria, Sudan e Yemen è contenuto nella legge HR 158 “Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act” emanata il 12.09.2015 dal sig.OBAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
ECCO IL TESTO
H.R.158 – Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015
114th Congress (2015-2016)
Sponsor:
Rep. Miller, Candice S. [R-MI-10] (Introduced 01/06/2015)
Committees:
House – Judiciary; Homeland Security
Committee Reports:
Latest Action:
12/09/2015 Received in the Senate.  (All Actions)
Roll Call Votes:
There has been 1 roll call vote
Tracker:
This bill has the status Passed House
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
  1. Introduced
  1. Passed House
More on This Bill
Subject — Policy Area:
Text: H.R.158 — 114th Congress (2015-2016)
All Bill Information (Except Text)
There are 3 versions:

Text available as:

Shown Here:
Received in Senate (12/09/2015)

114th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 158

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
December 9, 2015
Received

AN ACT
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide enhanced security measures for the visa waiver program, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. Short title.
This Act may be cited as the “Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015”.
SEC. 2. Electronic passport requirement.
(a) Requirement for alien To possess electronic passport.—Section 217(a)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(3)) is amended to read as follows:
“(3) PASSPORT REQUIREMENTS.—The alien, at the time of application for admission, is in possession of a valid unexpired passport that satisfies the following:
“(A) MACHINE READABLE.—The passport is a machine-readable passport that is tamper-resistant, incorporates document authentication identifiers, and otherwise satisfies the internationally accepted standard for machine readability.
“(B) ELECTRONIC.—Beginning on April 1, 2016, the passport is an electronic passport that is fraud-resistant, contains relevant biographic and biometric information (as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security), and otherwise satisfies internationally accepted standards for electronic passports.”.
(b) Requirement for program country To validate passports.—Section 217(c)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)(2)(B)) is amended to read as follows:
“(B) PASSPORT PROGRAM.—
“(i) ISSUANCE OF PASSPORTS.—The government of the country certifies that it issues to its citizens passports described in subparagraph (A) of subsection (a)(3), and on or after April 1, 2016, passports described in subparagraph (B) of subsection (a)(3).
“(ii) VALIDATION OF PASSPORTS.—Not later than October 1, 2016, the government of the country certifies that it has in place mechanisms to validate passports described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (a)(3) at each key port of entry into that country. This requirement shall not apply to travel between countries which fall within the Schengen Zone.”.
(c) Conforming amendment.—Section 303(c) of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 is repealed (8 U.S.C. 1732(c)).
SEC. 3. Restriction on use of visa waiver program for aliens who travel to certain countries.
Section 217(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(a)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(12) NOT PRESENT IN IRAQ, SYRIA, OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY OR AREA OF CONCERN.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C)—
“(i) the alien has not been present, at any time on or after March 1, 2011—
“(I) in Iraq or Syria;
“(II) in a country that is designated by the Secretary of State under section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 2405) (as continued in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)), section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780), section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371), or any other provision of law, as a country, the government of which has repeatedly provided support of acts of international terrorism; or
“(III) in any other country or area of concern designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security under subparagraph (D); and
“(ii) regardless of whether the alien is a national of a program country, the alien is not a national of—
“(I) Iraq or Syria;
“(II) a country that is designated, at the time the alien applies for admission, by the Secretary of State under section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 2405) (as continued in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)), section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780), section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371), or any other provision of law, as a country, the government of which has repeatedly provided support of acts of international terrorism; or
“(III) any other country that is designated, at the time the alien applies for admission, by the Secretary of Homeland Security under subparagraph (D).
“(B) CERTAIN MILITARY PERSONNEL AND GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.—Subparagraph (A)(i) shall not apply in the case of an alien if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that the alien was present—
“(i) in order to perform military service in the armed forces of a program country; or
“(ii) in order to carry out official duties as a full-time employee of the government of a program country.
“(C) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Homeland Security may waive the application of subparagraph (A) to an alien if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the law enforcement or national security interests of the United States.
“(D) COUNTRIES OR AREAS OF CONCERN.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall determine whether the requirement under subparagraph (A) shall apply to any other country or area.
“(ii) CRITERIA.—In making a determination under clause (i), the Secretary shall consider—
“(I) whether the presence of an alien in the country or area increases the likelihood that the alien is a credible threat to the national security of the United States;
“(II) whether a foreign terrorist organization has a significant presence in the country or area; and
“(III) whether the country or area is a safe haven for terrorists.
“(iii) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The Secretary shall conduct a review, on an annual basis, of any determination made under clause (i).
“(E) REPORT.—Beginning not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report on each instance in which the Secretary exercised the waiver authority under subparagraph (C) during the previous year.”.
SEC. 4. Designation requirements for program countries.
(a) Reporting lost and stolen passports.—Section 217(c)(2)(D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)(2)(D)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by striking “within a strict time limit” and inserting “not later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the theft or loss”.
(b) Interpol Screening.—Section 217(c)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)(2)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(G) INTERPOL SCREENING.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this subparagraph, except in the case of a country in which there is not an international airport, the government of the country certifies to the Secretary of Homeland Security that, to the maximum extent allowed under the laws of the country, it is screening, for unlawful activity, each person who is not a citizen or national of that country who is admitted to or departs that country, by using relevant databases and notices maintained by Interpol, or other means designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security. This requirement shall not apply to travel between countries which fall within the Schengen Zone.”.
(c) Implementation of passenger information exchange agreement.—Section 217(c)(2)(F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)(2)(F)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, and fully implements such agreement”.
(d) Termination of designation.—Section 217(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(6) FAILURE TO SHARE INFORMATION.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State jointly determine that the program country is not sharing information, as required by subsection (c)(2)(F), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall terminate the designation of the country as a program country.
“(B) REDESIGNATION.—In the case of a termination under this paragraph, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall redesignate the country as a program country, without regard to paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (c) or paragraphs (1) through (4), when the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, determines that the country is sharing information, as required by subsection (c)(2)(F).
“(7) FAILURE TO SCREEN.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date that is 270 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, if the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State jointly determine that the program country is not conducting the screening required by subsection (c)(2)(G), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall terminate the designation of the country as a program country.
“(B) REDESIGNATION.—In the case of a termination under this paragraph, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall redesignate the country as a program country, without regard to paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (c) or paragraphs (1) through (4), when the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, determines that the country is conducting the screening required by subsection (c)(2)(G).”.
SEC. 5. Reporting requirements.
(a) In general.—Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)), as amended by this Act, is further amended—
(1) in paragraph (2)(C)(iii)—
(A) by striking “and the Committee on International Relations” and inserting “, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Homeland Security”; and
(B) by striking “and the Committee on Foreign Relations” and inserting “, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs”; and
(2) in paragraph (5)(A)(i)—
(A) in subclause (III)—
(i) by inserting after “the Committee on Foreign Affairs,” the following: “the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,”;
(ii) by inserting after “the Committee on Foreign Relations,” the following: “the Select Committee on Intelligence”; and
(iii) by striking “and” at the end;
(B) in subclause (IV), by striking the period at the end and inserting the following: “; and”; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(V) shall submit to the committees described in subclause (III), a report that includes an assessment of the threat to the national security of the United States of the designation of each country designated as a program country, including the compliance of the government of each such country with the requirements under subparagraphs (D) and (F) of paragraph (2), as well as each such government’s capacity to comply with such requirements.”.
(b) Date of submission of first report.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit the first report described in subclause (V) of section 217(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. (c)(5)(A)(i)), as added by subsection (a), not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 6. High risk program countries.
Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(12) DESIGNATION OF HIGH RISK PROGRAM COUNTRIES.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, shall evaluate program countries on an annual basis based on the criteria described in subparagraph (B) and shall identify any program country, the admission of nationals from which under the visa waiver program under this section, the Secretary determines presents a high risk to the national security of the United States.
“(B) CRITERIA.—In evaluating program countries under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, shall consider the following criteria:
“(i) The number of nationals of the country determined to be ineligible to travel to the United States under the program during the previous year.
“(ii) The number of nationals of the country who were identified in United States Government databases related to the identities of known or suspected terrorists during the previous year.
“(iii) The estimated number of nationals of the country who have traveled to Iraq or Syria at any time on or after March 1, 2011, to engage in terrorism.
“(iv) The capacity of the country to combat passport fraud.
“(v) The level of cooperation of the country with the counter-terrorism efforts of the United States.
“(vi) The adequacy of the border and immigration control of the country.
“(vii) Any other criteria the Secretary of Homeland Security determines to be appropriate.
“(C) SUSPENSION OF DESIGNATION.—The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may suspend the designation of a program country based on a determination that the country presents a high risk to the national security of the United States under subparagraph (A) until such time as the Secretary determines that the country no longer presents such a risk.
“(D) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report, which includes an evaluation and threat assessment of each country determined to present a high risk to the national security of the United States under subparagraph (A).”.
SEC. 7. Enhancements to the electronic system for travel authorization.
(a) In general.—Section 217(h)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(h)(3)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (C)(i), by inserting after “any such determination” the following: “or shorten the period of eligibility under any such determination”;
(2) by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following:
“(D) FRAUD DETECTION.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall research opportunities to incorporate into the System technology that will detect and prevent fraud and deception in the System.
“(E) ADDITIONAL AND PREVIOUS COUNTRIES OF CITIZENSHIP.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall collect from an applicant for admission pursuant to this section information on any additional or previous countries of citizenship of that applicant. The Secretary shall take any information so collected into account when making determinations as to the eligibility of the alien for admission pursuant to this section.
“(F) REPORT ON CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON TRAVEL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this subparagraph and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the number of individuals who were denied eligibility to travel under the program, or whose eligibility for such travel was revoked during the previous year, and the number of such individuals determined, in accordance with subsection (a)(6), to represent a threat to the national security of the United States, and shall include the country or countries of citizenship of each such individual.”.
(b) Report.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on steps to strengthen the electronic system for travel authorization authorized under section 217(h)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(h)(3))) in order to better secure the international borders of the United States and prevent terrorists and instruments of terrorism from entering the United States.
SEC. 8. Provision of assistance to non-program countries.
The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall provide assistance in a risk-based manner to countries that do not participate in the visa waiver program under section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187) to assist those countries in—
(1) submitting to Interpol information about the theft or loss of passports of citizens or nationals of such a country; and
(2) issuing, and validating at the ports of entry of such a country, electronic passports that are fraud-resistant, contain relevant biographic and biometric information (as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security), and otherwise satisfy internationally accepted standards for electronic passports.
SEC. 9. Clerical amendments.
(a) Secretary of Homeland Security.—Section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187), as amended by this Act, is further amended by striking “Attorney General” each place such term appears (except in subsection (c)(11)(B)) and inserting “Secretary of Homeland Security”.
(b) Electronic system for travel authorization.—Section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187), as amended this Act, is further amended—
(1) by striking “electronic travel authorization system” each place it appears and inserting “electronic system for travel authorization”;
(2) in the heading in subsection (a)(11), by striking “electronic travel authorization system” and inserting “electronic system for travel authorization”; and
(3) in the heading in subsection (h)(3), by striking “electronic travel authorization system” and inserting “electronic system for travel authorization”.
SEC. 10. Sense of Congress.
It is the sense of Congress that the International Civil Aviation Organization, the specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for establishing international standards, specifications, and best practices related to the administration and governance of border controls and inspection formalities, should establish standards for the introduction of electronic passports (referred to in this section as “e-passports”), and obligate member countries to utilize such e-passports as soon as possible. Such e-passports should be a combined paper and electronic passport that contains biographic and biometric information that can be used to authenticate the identity of travelers through an embedded chip.
Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2015.
  • Attest:karen l. haas,Clerk

Il colonialismo di oggi si chiama globalizzazione

global brand

Forse il primo compito di un pensiero autenticamente critico dovrebbe consistere oggi nel favorire la deglobalizzazione dell’immaginario. Impiego questa formula – “deglobalizzazione dell’immaginario” – richiamandomi a Serge Latouche, che ha parlato a più riprese di “decolonizzazione dell’immaginario”: su questo punto, condivido la sua prospettiva, precisando però che oggi il nuovo colonialismo si chiama globalizzazione.
È, per così dire, il “colonialismo 2.0”: con cui si coartano tutti i popoli del pianeta all’inclusione neutralizzante del modello unico liberal-libertario globalista. Si tratta – come ho detto – di una “inclusione neutralizzante”, giacché la mondializzazione include e insieme neutralizza: include, giacché tutto riassorbe e nulla lascia fuori di sé (ciò che ancora non è incluso è diffamato come antimoderno, reazionario, populista, totalitario, ecc.); e neutralizza, perché, nell’atto stesso con cui annette, disarticola le specificità plurali dei costumi, delle culture, delle lingue. Le sacrifica sull’altare livellante del modello unico classista e reificante del consumatore individuale e senza radici, anglofono e senza identità.
Il mondialismo si caratterizza, in effetti, anche per questo: aspira a vedere ovunque il medesimo, ossia se stesso, il piano liscio del mercato senza barriere e senza frontiere, nei cui spazi stellari tutto scorre senza impedimento nella forma della merce e dei capitali finanziari: è anche e soprattutto per questa ragione che la tarda modernità assume la forma, per citare il compianto Zygmunt Bauman, di una “società liquida” a scorrimento illimitato dei capitali, delle merci e degli esseri umani ridotti a “merci” o a “capitale umano”.
Deglobalizzare l’immaginario – sia chiaro – non significa tornare alla società di “ancien régime”: non significa, cioè, far tornare indietro la ruota della storia. Significa, al contrario, riscontare l’insufficienza e le contraddizioni del mondo globalizzato: e, di lì, articolare un pensiero che si ponga a base di una nuova fondazione del vivere comunitario, andando al di là tanto della cattiva universalità del globalismo, quanto delle forme premoderne nel frattempo tramontate. Ben sapendo, ovviamente, quant’è difficile sistematizzare ciò che ancora non c’è.
di Diego Fusaro – 22/01/2017
Fonte: Fanpage