SARKOZY RATTRAPE PAR LE ‘TRIPOLIGATE’ (SALE TEMPS POUR SARKO II)

# PCN-INFO/

LM pour PCN-INFO/ 2016 09 28/

Avec Médiapart – PCN-SPO/

https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel/

http://www.lucmichel.net/

https://twitter.com/LucMichelPCN

PIH - LM sale temps sarko II tripoligate (2016 07 28) FR

« Un carnet consignait en 2007 les millions libyens de Nicolas Sarkozy »

– Médiapart (26 sept. 2016).

Soupçons de financement libyen de 2007 : selon «Mediapart», un carnet détaille les versements occultes au profit de Sarkozy !

Voilà Sarkozy rattrapé par le « Tripoligate » …

Ce sont de nouvelles révélations à charge contre l’ancien président de la République. Ce mardi, Mediapart fait état de l’existence d’un carnet de notes actuellement exploité par la justice, ayant appartenu à l’ancien ministre du pétrole libyen Choukri Ghanem et qui détaille le 29 avril 2007, une série de trois versements pour un total de 6,5 millions d’euros destinés à la campagne présidentielle de Nicolas Sarkozy.

LIRE SUR ELAC WEBSITE :

* L’argent sale de la Sarkozye : voila Tripoli qui apparaît dans le « Karachigate » !

http://www.elac-committees.org/2011/10/05/pcn-spo-l%E2%80%99argent-sale-de-la-sarkozye-voila-tripoli-qui-apparait-dans-le-%C2%AB-karachigate-%C2%BB/

* Tripoligate : nouveau témoignage d’un proche de Kadhafi sur le financement des campagnes de Sarkozy par la Jamahiriya

http://www.elac-committees.org/2013/07/31/luc-michel-focus-tripoligate-nouveau-temoignage-dun-proche-de-kadhafi-sur-le-financement-des-campagnes-de-sarkozy-par-la-jamahiriya-2/

* Et : Tripoligate : FR3 relance le dossier et 2voque ‘la voix accusatrice de Kadhafi !

http://www.elac-committees.org/2014/02/07/elac-alac-website-tripoligate-fr3-relance-le-dossier-et-evoque-%E2%80%98la-voix-accusatrice-de-kadhafi-2/

SOUPÇONS D’UN FINANCEMENT LIBYEN MASSIF

Depuis trois ans, la justice enquête en effet sur des soupçons d’un financement libyen massif de la campagne de l’ex-chef de l’Etat, alors président de l’UMP et ministre de l’Intérieur. Soupçons de financements que le clan sarkozyste a toujours nié, prétendant que les dirigeants libyens, qui ont affirmé l’inverse, « avaient tout construit a posteriori ». Manque de bol, le carnet de Choukri Ghanem date d’avril 2007, soit la période de la campagne présidentielle, même si l’ancien proche de Mouammar Kadhafi n’est plus vivant pour en témoigner (il a été opportunément retrouvé noyé dans le Danube en avril 2012).

Pour rappel : cette affaire politico-judiciaire vaut déjà une mise en examen pour «blanchiment de fraude fiscale», «faux» et «usage de faux»à Claude Guéant, le plus proche collaborateur de Sarkozy de l’époque, mis en cause pour avoir reçu 500 000 euros en provenance de l’État libyen …

QUE DIT MEDIAPART :

Extrait : « L’ancien ministre du pétrole libyen Choukri Ghanem, retrouvé noyé dans le Danube en avril 2012, a laissé derrière lui un carnet de notes actuellement exploité par la justice. L’ancien dirigeant y a détaillé, le 29 avril 2007, une série de trois versements destinés à la campagne présidentielle de l’ancien chef de l’État. C’est un petit carnet qui pourrait bien devenir le pire cauchemar de Nicolas Sarkozy. Le juge d’instruction parisien Serge Tournaire et les policiers de l’Office central de lutte contre la corruption (OCLCIFF) ont obtenu la communication des notes manuscrites d’un ancien dignitaire du régime Kadhafi qui détaillent une série de versements occultes au profit de l’ancien chef de l’État français, pour au moins 6,5 millions d’euros, au moment de l’élection présidentielle de 2007. »

* Lire aussi :

PCN-INFO/

MEDIAS – JUSTICE – REVELATIONS : SALE TEMPS POUR SARKO …

sur https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel/posts/885392064928546

LM / PCN-INFO

https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel/

http://www.lucmichel.net/

https://twitter.com/LucMichelPCN

QUI EST BUISSON L’EX-SPINDOCTOR DE SARKOZY ?

# LUCMICHEL. NET/

LM/ En Bref/

Avec le EODE Think Tank/2016 09 28/

https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel/

http://www.lucmichel.net/

https://twitter.com/LucMichelPCN

LM.NET - EN BREF LM qui est buisson (2016 09 28) FR

La « stratégie Buisson » …

Celle d’une droite radicalisée, où Sarkozy était en embuscade, qui lorgne toujours en 2016 sur les thèses du FN. Comme l’avait démontré la crise du « mariage pour tous », qui avait servi aux spindoctors de l’UMP (venus de l’extrême-droite) – les Buisson, Pelletier et cie – à dresser des ponts avec ce que la France néofasciste compte de pire. Dans un contexte qui permet la convergence des thèses de la Droite dure sarkozyste et de l’extrême-droite xénophobe et islamophobe lepéniste. A la maneuvre jusqu’en 2012, Patrick Buisson, ex lepéniste devenu le « spin doctor » de Sarkozy sur les questions de récupération de l’extrême-droite. Et son protégé, Guillaume Peltier, ex FNJ, ex villiériste  du MPF, résumé incarné de la stratégie de la « grande droite ». Buisson est parti, a trahit Sarko, mais Pelletier est toujours là !

Buisson « L’idéologue » dans l’équipe de campagne de Sarkozy expliquait LIBE, pour une fois hors carricature. Ex de MINUTE (hebdo français d’extrême-droite, mais opposé à Marine Le Pen en 2012), “auteur de l’hagiographique Album « Le Pen, images d’un Français », l’idéologue de Sarkozy partage les idées de Le Pen …

Nous avons souvent souligné les convergences idéologiques entre la Droite dure de Sarkozy et les Neocons US, le fer de lance du régime de Georges W. Bush II.  Y compris les alliances avec la Droite dure israélienne, les Likudniks, autre caractéristique des neocons US que l’on retrouve avec le régime sarkozyste. Les rapports entre le « neoconservatisme à la Française » et les Likudniks est un sujet tabou, passé sous silence en France. Pourtant ceux-ci trustent l’entourage de Sarkozy et occupent des postes étatiques importants et influents. Et nous n’avons jamais hésité à les qualifier de « neocons à passeport français ».

* Relire mon analyse de 2011-2013 pour EODE THINK-TANK :

LE NEOCONSERVATISME A LA FRANCAISE : LA LEPENISATION DELA DROITE POST-SARKOZYSTE !

sur http://www.eode.org/eode-think-tank-le-neoconservatisme-a-la-francaise-la-lepenisation-de-la-droite-post-sarkozyste/

LM

https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel/

http://www.lucmichel.net/

https://twitter.com/LucMichelPCN

MEDIAS – JUSTICE – REVELATIONS : SALE TEMPS POUR SARKO …

# PCN-INFO/

LM pour PCN-INFO/ 2016 09 27/

Avec Libération – L’Express – Le Monde/

https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel/

http://www.lucmichel.net/

https://twitter.com/LucMichelPCN

PIH - LM sale temps sarko I (2016 07 27) FR (2)

La une de Libé et l’événement, c’est Nicolas Sarkozy, rattrapé par une série d’accusations qui plombent sa campagne et son avenir … Ce mardi, l’Express de son côté dévoile les premiers extraits de La Cause du peuple, l’histoire interdite de la présidence Sarkozy, le livre écrit par Patrick Buisson (ex de Minute, ex du FN, aujourd’hui proche de Marion Maréchal-Le Pen) l’ex-conseiller de l’ex-président, à partir d’enregistrements qui malmènent particulièrement Nicolas Sarkozy.

 PIH - LM sale temps sarko I (2016 07 27) FR (1)

CE QUE DISENT LES PREMIERS EXTRAITS DU LIVRE DE PATRICK BUISSON SUR LA PRESIDENCE SARKOZY !?

«Valeurs communes» avec le FN, Chirac «corrompu» et «détestable» ou encore Fillon ce «pauvre type»… Buisson, pour comprendre, un spin-doctor d’extrême-droite, devenu le conseiller électoral de Sarkozy, était l’architecte de la radicalisaton électorale de la Droite sarkozyste …

* Lire :

EODE THINK-TANK / LE NEOCONSERVATISME A LA FRANCAISE : LA LEPENISATION DE LA DROITE POST-SARKOZYSTE !

sur http://www.eode.org/eode-think-tank-le-neoconservatisme-a-la-francaise-la-lepenisation-de-la-droite-post-sarkozyste/

Notons que le parfum de scandale est alimenté par Buisson (personnage cynique et détestable). Réagissant à la publication d’extraits d’un livre de Patrick Buisson, l’ancien conseiller de Nicolas Sarkozy, l’hebdomadaire Paris Match affirme n’avoir jamais été «contacté par quiconque» pour prendre des photos aux Invalides en 2006, lors de manifestations contre le CPE. Notons que dans son livre, Buisson n’écrit pas que c’est Match qui a été contacté, mais ses photographes. Mais peut-être que Match veut dire dans son tweet que ses photographes non pas été contactés non plus : “Contrairement aux écrits de P.Buisson Paris Match n’a jamais été contacté par quiconque pour réaliser des photos d’agressions/Invalides 2006” …

ET CERISE SUR LE GATEAU LA JUSTICE S’INTERESSE AUX BARBOUZERIES DE SARKOZY …

On l’apprenait hier: Bernard Squarcini, ancien directeur de la direction centrale du renseignement intérieur (DCRI, aujourd’hui DGSI), Christian Flaesch, ancien directeur de la PJ parisienne, et Michel Gaudin, actuel directeur de cabinet de Nicolas Sarkozy, ont été placés en garde à vue dans les locaux de l’inspection générale de la police nationale (IGPN) dans le cadre d’une information judiciaire ouverte par le parquet de Paris, pour «violation du secret de l’instruction», «entraves aux investigations», «trafic d’influence» et «compromission». Cependant, peu d’informations avaient filtré sur les motifs de ces interrogatoires. Ce matin, le Monde, qui s’est procuré un rapport de la police judiciaire daté de 2013, dévoile un peu des raisons de leur garde à vue. Selon le document, Bernard Squarcini aurait d’abord mis à cette époque à contribution son réseau dans la police pour servir à la fois ses intérêts, mais aussi ceux du clan Nicolas Sarkozy, qu’il aurait informé des développements de l’affaire Cahuzac. Par ailleurs, Flaesch et Squarcini auraient également divulgué des informations à des conseillers de Bernard Arnault sur une procédure concernant le groupe LVMH.

La conjonction des “révélations”, auxquelles s’ajoute Médiapart et des infos sur le Tripoligate libyen, révèle évidemment un chef d’orchestre, assez puissant pour diriger grands médias et juges. sans doute la contre-offensive de Hollande, qui entend aussi être à nouveau candidat …

Photo : Patrick Buisson : Minute, FN, Le Pen, Sarko, Marion Maréchal Le Pen et la chaîne Tv Histoire …

Luc MICHEL

https://www.facebook.com/Pcn.luc.Michel/

http://www.lucmichel.net/

https://twitter.com/LucMichelPCN

Esiste le dea bendata della Giustizia?

http://www.marcoscibona.it/home/?p=1106

TAV – SCIBONA, FREDIANI (M5S): “Esiste le dea bendata della Giustizia?”

L’Unione Europea si fonda sui valori del rispetto della dignità umana, della libertà, della democrazia, dell’uguaglianza, dello Stato di diritto e del rispetto dei diritti umani, compresi i diritti delle persone appartenenti a minoranze. L’Italia è membro dell’Unione Europea e ci si aspetta che tuteli le minoranze e il principio dell’uguaglianza.

Le misure cautelari che hanno colpito attivisti NoTav, ed in ultimo anche Nicoletta Dosio, ci conducono ad una riflessione: esiste le dea bendata della Giustizia? Sussiste la parità di trattamento nelle indagini riferite ai NoTav e in quelle riferite alla Lyon Turin Ferroviaire, ora Telt, società che procede ai lavori del Tunnel geognostico della Maddalena a Chiomonte, in Provincia di Torino?

Parrebbe di no.

Infatti abbiamo avuto modo di leggere una annotazione dei ROS nell’indagine contro l’ndrangheta denominata San Michele e lì i Ros (come già fecero i tecnici contrari al Tav Torino Lione) sollevarono non poche perplessità in ordine alla mancata effettuazione di una gara di appalto per i lavori del Tunnel Geognostico della Torino Lione, opera approvata a fine 2010 dal Cipe.

L’unica gara fu indetta nel 2004, sei anni prima l’approvazione del progetto del cantiere di Chiomonte. Ad oggi non è stata svolta gara europea alcuna per il cantiere di Chiomonte, gara obbligatoriamente prevista dalla normativa europea e che era espressamente prevista dalla domanda congiunta di finanziamento all’Unione Europea del 17 luglio 2007 e dalla decisione della Commissione di concessione del contributo finanziario.
Ci aspettiamo che la solerzia utilizzata contro i manifestanti NoTav venga utilizzata anche per indagare sull’assenza del presupposto del cantiere di Chiomonte: la gara pubblica di appalto.

Marco Scibona, Senatore M5S – Segretario 8a Commissione Lavori pubblici, comunicazioni
Francesca Frediani, Consigliera regionale M5S Piemonte

MARIA ZAKHAROVA, RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY SPOKEPERSON TO US AMBASSADOR POWER: “WHAT YOU DID IN IRAQ & LIBYA IS THE REAL BARBARISM”!

SYRIA COMMITTEES/

 SYRIA - VISUAL zakharova iraq libya (2016 09 27) ENGL

Russian MFA Spokesperson Maria #Zakharova to US @AmbassadorPower:

What you did in #Iraq & #Libya is the real barbarism

Avec Twitter/ 2016 09 27/

http://www.syria-committees.org/

https://www.facebook.com/syria.committees/

AMBASSADOR CHURKIN (RUSSIA) DURING THE SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING ON THE SITUATION IN SYRIA

SYRIA COMMITTEES WEBSITE/ 2016 09 27/

With Russian Mission to UN  – PCN-SPO/

http://www.syria-committees.org/

https://www.facebook.com/syria.committees/

 “Eastern Aleppo is controlled by over twenty armed groups with about 3,500 fighters. Jabhat Al-Nusrah units are the main force in the east of the city. Their overall strength amounts to around 2,000 fighters. They possess tanks, armored vehicles, a field artillery machines, rocket launch systems, not to mention so-called ‘hell canons’ for shooting gas cylinders, and many dozens of units of other military hardware, including heavy weaponry. This hardware certainly could not have been homemade – it was received from and continues to be supplied by generous Western patrons with the connivance of the US that leads the ‘coalition’.”

SYRIA - Churkin situation in syria (2016 09 27) FR

– Ambassador Churkin.

Statement by Ambassador Vitaly I. Churkin, Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, during the Security Council meeting on the situation in Syria :

Ms. President,

The grave tragedy that befell the Syrian people is in its sixth year. In 2011, Washington and some other Western capitals decided to continue reshaping the geopolitical space of the Middle East and North Africa, which started with the US and UK criminal invasion in Iraq in 2003. Besides, both in Libya and Syria, they continued to “swing an axe”, not shunning away from the support of terrorist groups. The inevitable implications, including break-up of countries and millions of refugees, were written off as an unforeseen “irritant”.

As a result, hundreds of armed groups are active in Syria, the territory of the country is bombed and shelled by just about everyone; the country’s return to peace has almost become an impossible task. Many months of work of Russian and US experts under the leadership of the Russian Foreign Minister and US State Secretary, as well as with the involvement of the Presidents of both countries led to a detailed plan reflected in the documents of September 9, the fulfillment of which in good faith could have calmed the situation on the ground, significantly improved the humanitarian situation, given an impetus to the resumption of intra-Syrian negotiations under the auspices of the UN. The start of its implementation was constantly delayed due to the sabotage of the irreconcilable opposition. These agreements had a lot of opponents. Unfortunately, we have an impression that their unconstructive position outweighed the desire for peace and common sense.

The US side virtually acknowledged its inability to have any influence on patronized groups and ipso facto honestly implement the reached agreements – first of all to separate moderate groups from terrorists and carry out related delineation on the ground. It was put down in black and white in all the documents. Nothing has been accomplished. We have seen only wanderings even on the issue of defining terrorist groups, suggesting that the main objective remains the preservation of military capacity of the adversaries of the SAR Government, whoever they are. Unscrupulous means and the most dubious allies were of help.

New conditions and ultimatums were laid down, which were changing as fast as a kaleidoscope. Ceasefire requests have become of a habit: either for 48 or for 72 hours. We have always been responsive, at least tried to, and made agreements with the Syrian Government. But finally, all this ended up with the militants’ regrouping, reinforcing and launching a new offensive.

Later, a demand to the Syrian Government came up to unilaterally stop flights of their Air Force as a precondition. First, for the period of three days – we agreed. Then it was said that the US President had changed his mind and seven days were needed – it was not clear why. Such tactical tricks cannot continue forever. We will no longer agree to make unilateral steps.

The bombardment by the so-called ‘coalition’ (it was reported to be British aircraft) of the position of the Syrian Army defending the Syrian city of Dayr Al-Zawr from the ISIS terrorists seriously impacted the agreements reached. There was a real threat that the terrorists would capture the city and it would inevitably lead to a slaughter of civilians. Fortunately, the Syrian Armed Forces with the assistance of the Russian Aerospace Forces had managed to prevent this tragic event.

A threat to the cessation of hostilities was emerging. However, Damascus showed an enviable restraint in this regard.

Ms. President,

As our colleagues, and it is clear why, spoke of the situation when the humanitarian convoy had come under shelling, I will say a few words on this issue.

First of all, I would like to note that here in New York we first heard about this from the US State Secretary who said in a private conversation: “We have information that two Russian aircraft were somewhere near the humanitarian convoy for a few minutes, near the place where it was attacked”. “But you should not worry”, he added, “we are not going to make this fact public as it needs to be carefully examined”. However, in a few minutes, as usual, leakages from various agencies in Washington started, and the following day the State Secretary made this tragedy one of the core elements of his dramatic statement in the Security Council. What I want to say is to explain the way we have to work with our US counterparts.

Another aspect is that we from the very beginning said that there is a need to examine everything; because at first it was reported to be shelling, then it was said to be helicopters, later – aircraft. I am not a military expert but today I have read somewhere that the bombing allegedly lasted seven hours. But if Russian planes had been somewhere in that area for several minutes, could bombs fall on the humanitarian convoy during seven hours? I do not think so. So let us investigate this incident. By the way, two months ago our Western counterparts promised to inform us about their investigation of the bombing attack on the Syrian city of Manbij where over 100 civilians had reportedly been killed. It was said to be French aircraft that bombed the city. But neither our French counterparts nor US leaders of the ‘coalition’ are in a rush to inform us of the outcomes of that investigation, which they promised to conduct two months ago.

Now, Ms. President, I will return to the Aleppo issue. The humanitarian situation in Aleppo could have been normalized in August. But armed groups prevented it because they continued to dictate their conditions of the operation and shell the humanitarian corridors with the connivance of their external sponsors. Deblocking was possible even in September. The Government withdrew its troops to the agreed distances and the authorities set up one of the checkpoints stipulated by the Agreement of September 9 with the Syrian Arab Red Crescent personnel present and gave permission for humanitarian convoy passage. But provocations by militants followed again.

I will give more details on the situation in Eastern Aleppo. Eastern Aleppo is controlled by over twenty armed groups with about 3,500 fighters. Jabhat Al-Nusrah units are the main force in the east of the city. Their overall strength amounts to around 2,000 fighters. They possess tanks, armored vehicles, a field artillery machines, rocket launch systems, not to mention so-called ‘hell canons’ for shooting gas cylinders, and many dozens of units of other military hardware, including heavy weaponry. This hardware certainly could not have been homemade – it was received from and continues to be supplied by generous Western patrons with the connivance of the US that leads the ‘coalition’, I suppose. In this regard I recall a Libya-related episode when the following question was voiced during the hearings attended by the State Secretary in the US Congress at the end of 2013. The question was: We know that some countries supplied 20,000 tons of weapons to Libya with the connivance of the United States. Could you please give this information to us? I assume, the State Department had to send this information to the Congress. We asked it to be shared with us as well, but have not received anything though the United States had to do it in accordance with the existing Security Council resolutions on Libya.

I suppose that the scope of the military support to the motley horde in Syria is bigger than it was in Libya. The positions of the Government forces and residential areas of the city are shelled daily from eastern districts of Aleppo. The shelling is blind without adjusting and aiming with a view to inflict maximum damage. Since September 1, over 50 military and over 120 civilians have died as a result of shelling from Eastern Aleppo. The specifics of Jabhat Al-Nusrah firing is that they install weapon sites close to social infrastructure objects – pumping stations, power substations, hospitals, schools, mosques – and in densely populated areas. In these situations civilians become a human shield for terrorists.

Principal strike directions of Jabhat Al-Nusrah are to north – via the Castello road to and to south-west – through Ramouseh district – aimed to breach the Government’s defense and create a corridor for reserves’ passage, weapons and ammunition supplies, often in the guise of humanitarian aid. By the way, our US counterparts have told us for a long time that Al-Nusrah is not present in Aleppo, it is somewhere in the south, then they confirmed that it is also in the north. In fact, Al-Nusrah is the main military force there. According to available information, over 80% of population in eastern districts support the lifting of the siege by means of peaceful negotiations and demand the terrorists to leave the city. A number of Aleppo militias are trying to find an opportunity to negotiate with the Government. However, Jabhat Al-Nusrah firmly suppresses this sentiment.

Since September 1, seven mass executions of people supporting the negotiations or willing to leave the city have been recorded. On 19 September

26 men and teenagers that had refused to take arms to support Al-Nusrah were shot dead in the presence of the residents of the Sheikh Hader. Mass exit of people was witnessed through seven humanitarian corridors created by Russia and the Syrian Government; they tell about savage reprisals against civilians. Upon exit the citizens are given humanitarian aid. Over 4,000 civilians and around 300 militants have left the eastern districts through these corridors since the start of the operation. Humanitarian access to the city is blocked by the armed groups. Since September 12, Russia, Syria and the UN have been trying to ensure the passage of humanitarian convoys to Aleppo using the Castello road. Demilitarization efforts have been made to that end. Twice, on September 14 and 16, the troops were withdrawn. On September 17, the personnel of the Syrian Red Crescent installed the Western checkpoint. The opposition refused to take similar measures stipulated by the Russia-US agreements of September 9. The coalition of illegal armed groups “Fatah Halab”, the Aleppo local council, as well as provisional opposition government declared that they would not let the aid into the city via the Castello road. Their militants threatened to attack convoys. As a result, the humanitarian operation in Aleppo, prepared at the end of last August by Russia and the UN, has been thwarted. The militants take food and water from civilians, take medicines and make them work at defense construction sites.

There were riots in the Avvad, al-Ansari, and Sahur districts of Aleppo. Protests have been brutally suppressed by terrorists using arms. Therefore, around 20,000 citizens of Aleppo fell hostage of Jabhat Al-Nusrah terrorists and other affiliated groups. These terrorists try to use women and children as a human shield.

The Government forces ensure security of the Castello and Ramouseh highways, as well as circular roads, that are strategically important for the city in terms of supplies. They open fire only in response to terrorists’ attacks and at developed and verified targets. They also suppress Al-Nusrah’s fierce attempts to break into the city from south-west and north. For a break-through, the terrorists actively use mined cars and armored troop carriers with suicide bombers. Since August 1, over 40 such attacks have taken place in Aleppo. Aviation is used against militants’ facilities and their groupings only with the use of air gunlayers and target illumination.

The main objective is to push the terrorists out of the city with the minimum civilian casualties. The militants are offered to negotiate. A special northern corridor to the Castello road is established for the exit with arms. The Russia-US agreements of September 9 provide for a mechanism ensuring the security of exit for combatants under the monitoring by the UN. Anyone willing to be granted an amnesty can use a simplified procedure of status clarification. Officers of the Russian Centre for Reconciliation are present in the areas of humanitarian corridors to monitor the situation and prevent inhumane treatment of militants. Civilians are offered all possible means to leave the city and get away from armed groups. Terrorists put obstacles to this. We see an attempt to launch an media campaign aimed at discrediting the Government’s measures to push terrorists out with the use of fakes and old video-recordings, including those made in Western Aleppo. The scale of the operation is exaggerated, video-recording of shelling is done in deserted south-west districts of the city, where fierce hostilities have been conducted for over a month. They are presented as indiscriminate strikes against peaceful districts of Eastern Aleppo.

Now, Ms. President, I will talk about the political process and will address to Mr. Staffan de Mistura as well as, certainly, to the Council members. It is necessary to resume the political process. We, frankly speaking, do not understand why since May no resolute actions have been taken in this regard. I would like to remind that the first statement by the International Syria Support Group contains the following provision (p. 9): “The participants together with the United Nations will explore modalities for and implementation of a nationwide ceasefire… in parallel with this renewed political process“. It means that the continuation of the political process is one of the most serious circumstances that should have helped the establishment and observance of the ceasefire.

I would like to ask Mr. de Mistura: Could you say who refused to engage in direct talks all this time? We know the answer. But I would like to hear it from you. Probably, it is time to stop dance around irresponsible politicians who pretend to present the interests of the Syrian people. If they are not willing to negotiate, they can return to those foreign capitals where they found haven. Those representatives of the Syrian opposition should come forward who really want to steer their country out of the crisis, and you know that there are such people.

And of course, I have mentioned the ceasefire. We would like this to remain our objective along with the resumption of talks. I would like to stress once again that we can discuss the revival of the ceasefire only on the basis of collective approach. It means that it is not us who have to unilaterally prove anything to anyone but others have to convince us of their sincere desire to dissociate the opposition cooperating with the US-led coalition from Jabhat Al-Nusrah. Then Jabhat Al-Nusrah should be finished off whereas the opposition should be made part of the political process. If they fail to convince us, it will only raise our suspicions that all this was done to take the heat off Jabhat Al-Nusrah. Thus, the only way out is to work jointly and honestly when all the sides implement the ceasefire agreements instead of putting forward unilateral demands about who should make a good-will gesture in the hope to be rewarded afterwards.

Thank you, Ms. President.

SYRIA COMMITTEES WEBSITE

_____________________

http://www.syria-committees.org/

https://www.facebook.com/syria.committees/

https://www.facebook.com/suriye.komitesi/

URSS e complotto giudaico

jimmie ha lasciato un nuovo commento sul tuo post “GIULIETTO E’ MOBILE QUAL PIUMA AL VENTO – Sputnik …“:

E’ lamentevole che cosi’ tanti, accomunati da anticomunismo genetico (per modo di dire) e da antisionismo obiettivo (visto quel che ha fatto e fa Israele in Medio Oriente e in America), continuino ad attribuire la nascita e l’essenza dell’USSR a un complotto giudaico.
Chi scrive non si professa un esperto, ma ha visitato l’USSR da molto giovane e poi vi ha lavorato con varie permanenze di qualche settimana ciascuna. Inoltre, ha studiato abbastanza a fondo le vite di alcuni personaggi, in modo particolare Stalin. Da cui ho concluso che,
*** Primo. Che il gruppo dirigente all’inizio della rivoluzione includesse un contingente nucleo di ebrei, non invalida ne’ la nascita ne’ lo sviluppo dell’USSR. Demonizzare l’USSR come parto dell’ebraismo e’ un doppio insulto alla storia. Perche’ le radici della rivoluzione d’Ottobre vanno cercate nella letteratura dell’800 – il pensiero russo, i classici russi, che vanno letti, non solo citati dal titolo, quasi l’equivalente dei philosophes francesi del ‘700, che prepararolo la rivoluzione dell’ ’89.
*** Secondo. Il 90% dell’informazione sull’USSR, diffusa in Occidente, era (e’) un mucchio di palle. A partire, ma non solo, dalla religione. Certo, la religione non era propagandata come in Italia, ma c’era l’istituto delle religioni, bellissimo palazzone stile anni 50, a Mosca, che teneva conto di tutte le religioni esistenti nel paese, con 80 repubbliche e ancor piu’ gruppi etno-religiosi, sette etc.
Anche il critico trinariciuto al contrario dovrebbe meditare che tutte le repubbliche islamiche erano liberissime di praticare la loro religione, e i loro cittadini avevano assoluta liberta’ di frequentare le loro madrasse privatamente. Tant’e’ che i subbugli e i bagni di sangue cominciarono dopo la dissoluzione dell’USSR, grazie anche al pizzaiolo (rubo da Fulvio) Gorbachev. E per di piu’, con lo stabilimento di basi americane in vari stati (ex-repubbliche sovietiche), con lo scopo finale dell’eliminazione della Russia – come del resto e’ in corso anche l’eliminazione dell’Italia e delle nazionalita’ europee, grazie alla programmata meticizzazione dell’Europa e all’invasione biblica dal terzo mondo.
Come gia’ espresso da altri, la Russia di Putin appare l’ultimo baluardo a difesa di quella che forse si puo’ ancora chiamare liberta’. Il neo-liberismo anglo-sionista e’ una sporca puttanata per l’inschiavimento del mondo – chi ha gli occhi li apra.
Da quel che sento, vedo in rete e leggo, non tutto, anzi non molto della “nuova” Russia mi piace, ma non conoscendola direttamente, non mi pronuncio.
Chi avesse tempo (e mi scuso per l’inglese), puo’ visionare una biografia di Stalin (in 5 puntate di 25 minuti ciascuna) a http://yourdailyshakespeare.com/historical-video-sketches Episodi #30, 32,33,34,35

MINISTER LAVROV (MAE RUSSE): ‘US AND THEIR WESTERN ALLIES WANT TO DISTRACT PUBLIC ATTENTION FROM ‘COALITION’ STRIKES ON SYRIAN FORCES’

SYRIA COMMITTEES/

SYRIA - VISUAL lavrov coalition strikes (2016 09 27) ENGL

Lavrov (on september 24, 2016 at UN):

“US and their Western allies want to distract public attention from ‘coalition’ strikes on Syrian forces”

With MFA russe/ 2016 09 27/

http://www.syria-committees.org/

https://www.facebook.com/syria.committees/

MARIA ZAKHAROVA, RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY SPOKEPERSON: “WHEN AMBASSADOR SAMANTHA POWER SAYS SOMETHING, YOU WANT TO CRY FOR THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD”

SYRIA COMMITTEES/

SYRIA - VISUAL zakharova vs power (2016 09 26) ENGL

Maria Zakharova:

“When (US) Ambassador Samantha Power says something, you want to cry for the future of the world…”

 Avec MFA Russia/ 2016 09 26/

http://www.syria-committees.org/

https://www.facebook.com/syria.committees/

* Infographie : PCN-SPO from Twitter.

MINISTER LAVROV (MAE RUSSE): ‘GEOPOLITICAL EXPERIMENTS THAT COST MILLIONS OF HUMAN LIVES ‘

SYRIA COMMITTEES/

SYRIA - VISUAL lavrov geopolitical experiments (2016 09 23) ENGL

 Lavrov (on september 24, 2016 at UN):

“It is unacceptable that some countries lecture others on what to do while engaging in all sorts of questionable activities (…) Geopolitical experiments that cost  millions of human lives” …

Avec MAE russe/ 2016 09 27/

http://www.syria-committees.org/

https://www.facebook.com/syria.committees/